No Meetings
As a Product Owner or Scrum Master
I want to understand how to deal with ‘meetings’ in an AgileBI project
So that I can change the team’s negative view on collaboration
A Massive Change
One of the biggest challenges of using Agile methods to deliver BI projects is the massive change in the way the team has to work.
Everything from the way they plan, their level of accountability, the way they interact with their team, interact with other teams and stakeholders, and the tools and techniques used are all different to what they are familiar with.
Meetings, Meetings, Meetings but not an Outcome to Find
One of the interesting changes is moving the team from their concept of meetings. To the team a meeting is something that:
- is planned in the future
- often has unclear goals
- a raft of people are invited to, often even if they are not required to achieve those goals
- is always for at least an hour in duration
- is often seen as a waste of everybody’s time
Unless its an AgileBI “Meeting”
When undertaking an Agile project, we actually see a massive increase in the amount of time the team spend together collaborating, from attending sprint planning, backlog grooming, retrospectives through to constant group sessions to nut out the many problems they strike.
Initially though we will often see the usual disparaging attitude to these collaboration sessions as they are perceived as the meetings of old.
Planning has Massive Value
Once the team gets to experience the value that sprint planning delivers in helping them work through the steps that they will undertake in the upcoming sprint, they will typically embrace them with open arms. The same can be said for backlog grooming, once the team experience how constantly refining the user stories in advance helps reduce the time required for sprint planning, as well as ensuring that every new requirement is captured weekly, they see the value in these planning sessions.
One interesting example that we often see is the use of meetings to help troubleshoot a problem or clarify an expectation.
Where possible the AgileBI team is always co-located to assist with collaboration and communication. When a new team starts working together and strikes a problem, they will often book a meeting in everybody’s diary at sometime in the future to work through the issue. The same is when they want to clarify the expectation for a user story with the product owner, a meeting is booked in the future.
When running three week iterations these delays can kill the successful delivery of the sprint. Given the team are all dedicated to the sprints there is nothing stopping the team from getting together to discuss the issue when it arises, often by just swiveling their chairs around or by all immediately getting up and standing around a whiteboard.
It’s not until you point this out though that the team realise the latency that these future based meetings cause and change their behaviour.
As with all things Agile, constant collaboration is a major change in the way the team works and often simple behaviours that have been embedded for years need to be changed.
Meetings are DEAD, long live Collaboration
In our AgileBI projects, we ban the use of the word “Meeting”.
All pre-planned events that require the team to get together are scheduled at the beginning of the sprint and have an outcome. Those events are named after that outcome (e.g., backlog grooming). Any other requirement for the team to collaborate are a result of the user stories being delivered, and the team should immediately get together to ensure there is no delay in removing the roadblocks for that user story.
In a three-week sprint, every day counts.
AgileBI
As a BI Practitioner
I want to understand what AgileBI is and how it differs to Agile
So that I know what techniques to use (and whihc techniques not to)
AgileBI Process
As a BI Practitioner
I want to understand what AgileBI processes are
So that I know what processes to implement (and what processes not to)
Building AgileBI Block by Block – Agile Data Modelling = Data Vault
An awesome Data Vault course We had the privilege of hosting Hans Hultgren in our Wellington offices this week for his 3 day Data Vault Certification course. It was a great three days and confirmed for me that we have found another crucial lego block in our AgileBI...
Trifacta = I can code! (and free data wrangling on your desktop)
Wrangling data as an analyst has always been a tricky issue. If you can code your can do whatever you need with your favourite tool. If you can’t you need to use a GUI data analysis tool.
Tirfacta is the latest in cool data analyst focussed GUI tools.
Hans Hultgren – Wellington Data Vault Modeling & Certification Course
As you may have worked out if you have been reading our blogs for a while, we are big fans of the Data Vault approach as a way of automating the Enterprise layer of a Data Warehouse (DW). Late last year we sent a couple of our DW experts to Sydney to attend Hans...
QlikSense Menus – They are all greek to me
We found an interesting issue with QlikSense 2.0 the other day, where the menu options all looked like Hieroglyphics or Greek characters rather than the english characters. A close up of the right hand menu shows the problem: The problem ended up being...
ODE – Just ship it!
Just Ship It Already! Steve Jobs said "Real Artists Ship" . Ma.tt has a great blog about shipping One point oh. And there is a loverly comment at the end of the blog that goes: "A great entrepreneur once told me that “an idea without execution is worthless.” We can...
MSD Marker Project – Better outcomes for New Zealand
I can never find this YouTube Video when I need it, so im putting it in a blog so I can find it next time. https://youtu.be/oK6T9DsH4SU
BI Problems – Data Requirements
BUSINESS USER BUSINESS ANALYST The Scenario? An analyst asks business users what they require to be delivered. The business user articulates what they require and the analyst documents this in a standard requirements document template. But when the solution is...